Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta magazine. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta magazine. Mostrar todas las entradas

8.3.14

The New Traveler: A Letter from Editor in Chief Pilar Guzmán

Vía Condé Nast Traveler.



Around our offices, the most abiding litmus test for a story is "Does it make you want to jump on a plane?" Sounds easy enough, though you would be surprised at how many seemingly sound story ideas hit the cutting-room floor because of their failure to deliver on the flutter factor.

These days, we are all transported dozens of times a day by the Pavlovian stroke of an index finger across a tiny mobile screen; we scroll from a perfect latte in Portland, to a snow-covered mountain face in the French Pyrenees, to a bowl of pho in Hoi An, in a span of seconds. Social media, with its raw immediacy and pith, has raised the authenticity bar for all content makers, inspiring us to be ever more transparent, personal, and up-to-the-minute in print and digital.

And at a time when you can Google Image just about every natural or man-made wonder in the world, it's our job to constantly evolve our visual language and storytelling style so that it allows readers to see the same beaches, zebra herds, and architectural marvels with fresh focus. We balance the iconic and enduring with the impassioned and immediate, factoring in a vastly changed travel landscape—these days a restaurant or art opening is as good a reason as any to book a trip. As you browse through this month's issue, you will notice that it looks different, starting with the cover, an arresting image by Inez and Vinoodh. We've inverted the magazine's traditional framing from far-flung locale with anonymous woman in the distance to full-frame global citizen Christy Turlington Burns with far-flung locale reflected in her lenses.

In many ways we are returning to our roots. When the magazine was launched in 1987 by Sir Harold Evans, its distinction in the travel category was marked as much by novel photography as by journalistic rigor. What other travel publication in 1987 would have run Helmut Newton's provocative picture of two women dining topless in a Berlin restaurant?



As for the rest of the issue, a redesign to us means changing not only the look of the pages but the way we find and tell stories in order to reclaim that element of surprise. We have used the opportunity to poke holes in every section and to question whether what we cover and how we cover it delivers on our twin promises of inspiration and service. Our aim is for the magazine, the Web site (about to relaunch, so please stay tuned), and our social channels to replicate the experience of getting the download from our most interesting, most well-traveled, most in-the-know friends.

Sometimes a truly memorable trip is the one when the unexpected happens, when you get lost in a good way. But spontaneity takes planning, gathering, and the collective wisdom of travelers you trust. Which is why many of the stories in this issue came out of casual conversations with photographers, writers, influencers, designers, and stylists who, in discussing potential assignments, shared snapshots from personal trips that caught our eye. It is precisely their passionate discoveries that together form an insider's guide which we hope speaks to the real needs of travelers. You see, we are less interested in any "definitive guide" than we are in the very specific adventures of discerning travelers. From photographer Dewey Nicks's visit to the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan, to Simon Romero's meditation on his adopted city, Rio, the common thread in all the stories is that they are deeply personal. As any great journey should be.

Pilar Guzmán, Editor in Chief

Ver:
The New York Post: New editor realizes her vision of Condé Nast Traveler.

New York Observer: Pilar Guzmán Named EIC of Condé Nast Traveler.

El Mundo: Anna Wintour, el poder absoluto de la editora.

10.6.13

Beatriz Colomina discloses why she finds Playboys so academically fascinating

Vía Architectural Review.



Publicado el 25 January 2011 | By Will Hunter

As director of the architecture PhD programme at Princeton University, Beatriz Colomina has led research into experimental architectural publications from the 1960s and 70s

Opening in 2006 as an exhibition in New York, then travelling as a ‘growing archive’ around the world, this body of work was published at the end of last year as the book Clip, Stamp, Fold: The Radical Architecture of Little Magazines 196X to 197X (Actar). In January, the AR caught up with Colomina to talk about publications past and present - and her new interest in Playboy

Architectural Review What made you pick little magazines as an area of interest?

Beatriz Colomina When I started directing the PhD programme in 2000, I saw the students really isolated in their own research and I wanted to do something collaborative to bring them together. Most of the students wanted to do dissertations on the 1960s and 70s, so I thought of the little magazines as a way to understand the culture of that period. Publications such as Archigram in London or Oppositions in New York and so many others had an incredible impact, about which people were having amnesia.

AR Why did you widen your research to bigger, commercial magazines?

BC We realised something extraordinary: that very traditional, established magazines of that period suddenly changed. For a time Hans Hollein edited the really boring Bau in Austria and produced an extraordinary series with unbelievable graphics and content. At Architectural Design [AD] in London, it switches from a very beautiful magazine edited by Kenneth Frampton that published the work of the Smithsons very well, to Robin Middleton and Peter Murray taking over and featuring the 1960’s radicals, losing all their advertising, using cheaper paper stock, and becoming counter cultural. Even Casabella and Domus changed. It was the small influencing the big rather than the other way round.

AR Do you think we’re witnessing second wave of that with the internet?

BC Certainly mainstream media like newspapers and television now rely on sources that are not your typical journalists. With the famous fire of Rem Koolhaas’s work in Beijing, CNN was relying on images from YouTube uploaded from cellphones. In architecture if all the images of a new building are immediately put online, either by the architect or even just people with a camera, what is the role of an architectural journal today? I’m sure there is one, but it has to change.

AR What do you think about the state of architectural education at the moment?

BC Nothing very extraordinary has happened in a very long time. In fact the project I started last year with the students is called Radical Pedagogy. So much has been done on the prewar period such as the Bauhaus, that we’re focusing on the post-war years, from Carbondale and the School of Venice to Peter Eisenman’s Institute of Architecture and Urban Studies, Alvin Boyarsky at the AA of course, perhaps Matthias Ungers at Cornell. I have the impression that around this time the most radical experiments in architectural pedagogy happened and that we’ve been spinning the wheel for a while. Even the most successful schools are now recycling techniques.

AR How come you’ve started researching Playboy?

BC It kept coming up in our work on the 1960s-70s. Hans Hollein, for example, mentioned in his Clip, Stamp, Fold interview that when he went to Moscow to see Leonidov for Bau they confiscated his Playboys. I began to realise that it was a very important journal for that generation and started to find it on lots of architectural bibliographies. Everyone says you could read Playboy for the features, but you could also look at it for the architecture. Nobody has studied this and I think it’s fascinating; as a woman I can probably get away with it more. The librarians at Princeton were very alarmed when I asked them to buy all the Playboys from 1950 to 1970 - they keep them in the PhD room instead the library.

AR How does Playboy treat architecture in its pages?

BC Everything that happened in architectural discourse is presented in the magazine butit’s sexualised. They started featuring Mies and Frank Lloyd Wright, and then in the 60s and 70s they started Playboy Pads, a series that reshot existing buildings - such as the House of the Century by Ant Farm and the apartment of Charles Moore; at the time he was the Dean of School of Architecture at Yale, which could not be more stuffy, and to have his home presented as a Playpad is perverse, as he was gay.

AR Where is the project up to?

BC The Nai/Bureau Europe in Maastricht immediately said they’d take it as an exhibition and we’re working on a book with essays by the students. We’ve already been to the Playboy Corporation in Chicago to work in the archives and interview key players. For the photo shoot of designers such as Eames, Saarinen, and Nelson alongside their chairs, for example, the archive reveals fascinating correspondence with them worrying about what they’re going to wear. In the spring I hope to go to LA and interview Hugh Hefner. Of course, the magazine objectifies women, but it also embraced liberation too. It’s more complicated than you’d think.

Playboy Architecture 1953-1979, The exhibition focuses on how the magazine Playboy deployed architecture and design to shape a new identity for the American man. The exhibition has been prepared in close collaboration with the Ph.D. program of the School of Architecture and the Media and Modernity program at Princeton University on the basis of a three-year research project led by Professor Beatriz Colomina.

22.4.13

Light Shots, concurso de películas de arquitectura, extendió su fecha límite hasta el 3 de mayo.

Vía Architects Journal.



La fecha límite se ha extendido, haz una película de 60 segundos, súbela a Youtube y gana £500.

DEADLINE EXTENDED: Make 60 second movie, upload to YouTube, win £500

Entrants to Light Shots, the AJ’s film contest in partnership with Philips have a few more days to finish their films

The AJ and Philips have teamed up to launch Light Shots, a short film competition with a first prize of £500. Architects and architecture students are invited to submit a short video film (60 seconds or under) on the theme of light, exploring the impact of artificial light on the places in which we live.

Film has a long history of exploring cities and the impact of light on the built environment. In the compressed timespan the short film offers, entrants are challenged to investigate an aspect of how we live and how light shapes us and our environments.

How to apply

Shorts should be uploaded, and forms completed by midnight MAY 3, 2013

The competition entries can be created in any format (Super-8, 16/35mm, video, animation) but must be uploaded as a digital file in any of the following file formats: .MOV, .MPEG4, .MVI, . WMV, .MPEGPS, .FLV, 3GPP and WebM

Submissions must not exceed 60 seconds in length. There is no minimum length requirement

Entries can be silent or with sound

The filmmakers name and title of the work must be clearly displayed at the beginning of each submission

The film can be set in a city, town or village, either outside or in an interior space. It should stimulate, entertain and delight and can be shot at night or during the day. It can be in digital format, or on Super 8, a stop-frame animation, a time-lapse or any other means of capturing a moment in time, but no longer than 60 seconds.

Prizes include £500 cash, a trip to Philips’ Outdoor Lighting Application Center near Lyon, a Philips Hue lighting system and subscriptions to The Architects’ Journal and Architectural Review. Shortlisted films will be available to view on the AJ website and shown at a screening in Central London.

The deadline for entries is Midnight 3 MAY.